Candidate Jane Doe
Your Application Report
Tailored analysis of your application, recruiter feedback, and client insights to help you understand your fit, benchmark against peers, and refine your pitch.
Published date
🚀 Aug 12, 2025
Applied date
📥 Aug 13, 2025
Pitch status
❌ Rejected
Reruiter
👤 John Smith
How to use it?
This report is more than a rejection note — it’s a roadmap to improve your chances in future applications.
🧠 Turn rejection into growth
🧭 Understand client expectations
📊 Compare your pitch to competitors
🎯 Refine your positioning for future applications
✅ Role Fit
Role Overview
Highlights
Candidate
Jane Doe
Role
UX/UI designer for SaaS MVP
Client
Apple Inc.
✅ You can start ASAP and they needed that
⚠️ Your rate was higher than the stated budget
❌ Language skills were below client’s requirement
Overall, your profile showed strong seniority and relevant expertise, but your higher rate and missing language skills limited alignment with this role. With adjustments, your pitch remains highly competitive for similar opportunities.
Fit Breakdown
You
🏆 Overall Score
📊 Benchmarking
Pool Overview
Highlights
Total applied
212
Shortlisted
12
Rejected
199
✅ Strong experience – Top 10 in the pool
⚠️ High rate – Above average & budget
❌ Portfolio score – Below peers, quick win to improve
With rate adjustment and portfolio polish, you’d likely move into the top 10%
You vs. Competition (212 pitches)
🏆 Winner vs. You
Winner Profile
Your Profile
Winner
Confidential
💰 Hourly Rate
$100
25%
💪 Experience
8 yrs
25%
✅ Fit Score
100%
Match
📍 Location
Berlin
Match
🏢 Commute
On-site
Match
🗣 German
Fluent
Match
📆 Availability
40 hrs/w
Match
🛠️ Skills
UX design
UI design
Motion design
Match
🏆 Overall standing
1st
✅ Why they won
Their profile matched all core requirements — fluent German, on-site availability, and a portfolio score that stood out.
You
Jane Doe
💰 Hourly Rate
$120
25%
💪 Experience
20 yrs
25%
✅ Fit Score
75%
Gap
📍 Location
Budapest
Gap
🏢 Commute
Remote
Disqualified
🗣 German
No
Disqualified
📆 Availability
20 hrs/w
Match
🛠️ Skills
UX design
UI design
UX research
Match
🏆 Overall standing
32nd
❌ Why you didn’t
Your higher rate and missing language/onsite fit outweighed your strong experience and skills.
🧠 Summary
Strenghts
Weaknesses
⚖️ Verdict
✅ For future roles:
You’re highly competitive for remote, senior-level UX/UI projects in English-speaking or international environments, where experience and expertise are valued over local fluency.
❌ For this role:
Your chances were limited due to budget, language, and onsite requirements.
🚀 Next Steps
Turn this report into action.
1
Reflect on your gaps 🤔
Did rate, availability, or skills hold you back?
2
Update your pitch 🛠️
Adjust your portfolio, CV, and intro messages with the insights.
3
Target better-fit roles 🎯
Focus on jobs where your profile is stronger aligned.
4
Keep applying 🔄
Rejections are normal. Use each report to improve your odds.
5
Invest in growth 📈
Upskill in areas where you see repeated gaps (tools, languages, soft skills).
Thank you for using PitchCompare 🙌
🔎 Methodology
PitchCompare analyzes your application across rate, experience, availability, and portfolio strength. We compare your profile with other applicants for the same role to highlight where you matched, where you missed, and how to improve.
FAQ
Can recruiters see this report?
Where do the benchmarks come from?
What if I don’t find it useful?
Ready to go deeper?
Unlock competitor breakdowns, portfolio feedback, and personalized next steps.
Not useful? Instant refund. No questions asked.
© 2025 PitchCompare — Beta product. Reports are for informational use only.
Demo Report — your real report will look exactly like this.
🖥️
Sorry, PitchCompare works only on desktop now…
Our reports are interactive and optimized for larger screens.
Please open this link on your laptop or desktop to view your report.